From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41727: 26.3; Doc of `define-minor-mode' and minor-mode commands Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 17:31:50 +0300 Message-ID: <83y2oz6j6x.fsf@gnu.org> References: <963d4189-17dc-4f4e-9993-0335fa271e50@default> <83k10kafha.fsf@gnu.org> <9d7f8447-1c0b-46db-a40c-c1ed2a398c46@default> <838sh081lt.fsf@gnu.org> <87wo4jb33s.fsf@web.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="3933"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 41727@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 07 16:33:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jhwMH-0000uc-RS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 16:33:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57338 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhwMG-0004fR-Gw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 10:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhwMA-0004fH-GX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 10:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43047) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhwMA-0005Cn-7A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 10:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jhwMA-0005l9-3J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 10:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 14:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41727 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41727-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41727.159154033822034 (code B ref 41727); Sun, 07 Jun 2020 14:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41727) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jun 2020 14:32:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54593 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jhwLD-0005j1-PB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 10:32:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52990) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jhwLB-0005iY-Ls for 41727@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 10:32:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52404) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhwL6-0004zv-Bz; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 10:31:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3735 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jhwL5-0008Ma-Ht; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 10:31:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wo4jb33s.fsf@web.de> (message from Michael Heerdegen on Sun, 07 Jun 2020 12:08:07 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:181669 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Cc: Drew Adams , 41727@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 12:08:07 +0200 > > AFAIU Drew wants to mention that even in the noninteractive case > `prefix-numeric-value' is called on the ARG before testing it. If that's the essence of the bug report (and I indeed didn't realize that), then I don't think it's a good idea to document this quirk. It looks like an implementation detail to me, if not an outright bug that should be fixed.