From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22763: 25.1.50; Feature Request -- A faster method to obtain line number at position. Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 21:52:07 +0200 Message-ID: <83y2fzlkpk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y4aclofm.fsf@gnu.org> <878s7z532u.fsf@gnus.org> <87y2fz3lpe.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7mn22ls.fsf@gnus.org> <83eehrn408.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2fzzqxb.fsf@gnus.org> <87tuqnzqh2.fsf@gnus.org> <83blcvn1ku.fsf@gnu.org> <87czxbznly.fsf@gnus.org> <834kinmzpy.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh0fy82q.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9720"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 22763@debbugs.gnu.org, esq@lawlist.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 07 20:53:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l8q7O-0002QV-ST for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 20:53:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33626 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8q7N-0002xH-Pr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 14:53:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42894) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8q7D-0002x6-FQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 14:53:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37352) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8q7C-00023H-6e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 14:53:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8q7C-0001o8-5l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 14:53:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 19:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22763 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 22763-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22763.16127275296886 (code B ref 22763); Sun, 07 Feb 2021 19:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22763) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2021 19:52:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48898 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8q6L-0001n0-9R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 14:52:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53114) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l8q6J-0001mn-FM for 22763@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 14:52:07 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36633) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8q6C-0001cV-6k; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 14:52:01 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1107 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l8q66-0007Ch-TM; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 14:51:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87zh0fy82q.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 07 Feb 2021 20:46:37 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199558 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 22763@debbugs.gnu.org, esq@lawlist.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca > Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 20:46:37 +0100 > > > In my benchmarks some years ago it was about twice slower, not 10 > > times. > > Perhaps memchr has gotten faster over the years? No, it was fast then as well (due to inlining, AFAIR). I think the main factor is the file used to benchmark this stuff. I don't remember what I used.