From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46502: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] (d3a399dd) native-comp bootstrap failure Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 14:42:06 +0200 Message-ID: <83y2fizza9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o8gn8ciy.fsf@md5i.com> <83h7m95tt2.fsf@gnu.org> <83ft1s2mp1.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6rz15jm.fsf@gnu.org> <831rdb0yt9.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgzzyn72.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13762"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mwd@md5i.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 46502@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 20 13:43:52 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lDRc0-0003VU-II for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 13:43:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55158 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDRbz-000726-JH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 07:43:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60238) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDRbC-0006C2-AN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 07:43:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39651) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDRbB-0006Bb-Ld for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 07:43:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDRbB-0006Qh-Ig for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 07:43:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46502 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46502-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46502.161382495624683 (code B ref 46502); Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46502) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2021 12:42:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51197 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDRam-0006Q3-JR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 07:42:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42254) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDRak-0006Pq-Ky for 46502@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 07:42:35 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42454) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDRab-0005uX-HA; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 07:42:26 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3903 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lDRab-0004Sn-1y; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 07:42:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Pip Cet on Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:03:42 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200422 Archived-At: > From: Pip Cet > Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:03:42 +0000 > Cc: Stefan Monnier , mwd@md5i.com, 46502@debbugs.gnu.org, > akrl@sdf.org > > > Btw, if you let macroexp.el byte-compile uninterrupted, then rename > > the .elc file and re-compile the .el file, do you get identical .elc > > files? > > So what I did is this: > > 1. make > 2. wait for bootstrap.pdmp to be built > 3. wait for macroexp.elc and the other files in compile-first to be generated > 4. interrupt > 5. rename byte-opt.elc to byte-opt.elc.1 > 6. make > 7. wait for byte-opt.elc to be rebuilt > 8. diff > > I saw differences as before. > > Did you want me to rename "macroexp.elc" in step 5? No, you did TRT. So the conclusion is that the differences have nothing to do with interrupting the build, they are caused by some of the COMPILE_FIRST files being not yet compiled?