From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46495: 28.0.50; [native-comp] Build fails for 32bit --with-wide-int Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:27:21 +0300 Message-ID: <83y2eap33a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86y2fq93zj.fsf@gmail.com> <83lfbqbq3g.fsf@gnu.org> <868s7pwvq8.fsf@gmail.com> <28FB9567-61E6-4083-8711-6CF6C8A493F4@gnu.org> <86o8gjheaw.fsf@gmail.com> <865z2p0zrq.fsf@gmail.com> <86pn0w59nj.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24768"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, 46495@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 26 12:28:20 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lPkdY-0006KU-KO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:28:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49774 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPkdX-0005UI-LO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:28:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41728) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPkdH-0005U1-2W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57213) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPkdF-0005uZ-O7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPkdF-0002zx-Jw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:28:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 11:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46495 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46495-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46495.161675805011488 (code B ref 46495); Fri, 26 Mar 2021 11:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46495) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Mar 2021 11:27:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40526 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPkck-0002zE-75 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:27:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48554) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPkci-0002yx-Rq for 46495@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:27:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56913) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPkcd-0005ZN-HS; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:27:23 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1902 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lPkcZ-00023g-P8; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:27:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: (bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203042 Archived-At: > Cc: 46495@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:18:55 +0000 > From: Andrea Corallo via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > Eli, how do you find the current branch stability on 32bit wide-int? It looks in good shape, AFAICT. One issue left, which I'm pursuing locally, is the one with strange gaps in the C backtraces. You can see the traces of that on the gdb-patches mailing list. When I finish that investigation, hopefully next week, we will be able to see whether this is some bug in the native-comp branch or just lack of debug info; in the latter case I will probably ask for changing the default debug-level in comp.el, at least on MS-Windows. Stay tuned.