From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47784: 27.2: ses-header-row [PATCH INCLUDED] Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:03:12 +0300 Message-ID: <83y2des9yn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210415033147.a3hoclq24colpjf7@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83eef8vhdr.fsf@gnu.org> <20210419092430.zv5gorzsvn5g2cdc@E15-2016.optimum.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11019"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 47784@debbugs.gnu.org To: Boruch Baum Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 19 15:04:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lYTZT-0002mu-WE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:04:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45024 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYTZT-0008CM-3G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:04:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40936) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYTZK-0008Bl-Or for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:04:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37191) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYTZK-0005Ae-HX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lYTZK-0004y8-DM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47784 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 47784-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47784.161883742519076 (code B ref 47784); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47784) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Apr 2021 13:03:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48737 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lYTZ3-0004xX-03 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:03:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56476) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lYTYw-0004x7-Ly for 47784@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:03:42 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39794) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYTYp-0004yZ-RG; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:03:32 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1555 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lYTYl-0006Vd-SK; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:03:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20210419092430.zv5gorzsvn5g2cdc@E15-2016.optimum.net> (message from Boruch Baum on Mon, 19 Apr 2021 05:24:30 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:204442 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 05:24:30 -0400 > From: Boruch Baum > Cc: 47784@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Thanks, but I don't think I understand the rationale for the second > > patch. What is the problem with signaling an error in those two > > places? > > They avoid spawning a backtrace buffer when toggle-debug-on-error is set > and the error is a user input error caught by a validation test within > an `interactive' function call. I understand that, but the same is true for every call to 'error' whenever debug-on-error is set. Since by default debug-on-error is NOT set, I don't think I agree with that part of the change. (Why do you even have that variable set non-nil?)