unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: fabrice nicol <fabrnicol@gmail.com>
Cc: 47408@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#47408: [PATCH] Etags support for Mercury -- fix explicit tags for existentially-quantified procedures
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:50:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83y2b8zrxa.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c5544bb0-9f8e-e432-d73d-708a29d6a917@gmail.com> (message from fabrice nicol on Mon, 14 Jun 2021 20:52:54 +0200)

> Cc: 47408@debbugs.gnu.org, pot@gnu.org
> From: fabrice nicol <fabrnicol@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 20:52:54 +0200
> 
> Agreed. (But you may have more systematically explicit tags because of 
> this condition 2.)
> 
> The attached patch was tested, builds and runs OK. Replaces the former 
> one, is you stick to the option of modifying 's' by reference rather 
> than creating a copy.

Thanks.  I confirm that this works, but I have 2 follow-up issues with
this patch:

1. It adds tags for some identifiers that AFAUI are actually
   keywords, and shouldn't be in the TAGS tables.  Examples:
   "interface" (e.g., on line 146 of accumulator.m) and
   "implementation" (e.g., on line 166).  I guess this is unintended?
   If so, how to fix it?

2. It always produces "explicitly named" tags, which I think is
   unnecessary.  AFAICT, this is related to the following snippet from
   mercury_pr:

> +      /* Left-trim type definitions.  */
> +
> +      while (pos > namelength + offset
> +	     && c_isspace (s[pos - namelength - offset]))
> +	--offset;
> +
> +      /* There is no need to correct namelength or call notinname.  */
> +      s[pos - offset - 1] = '\0';
> +
> +      make_tag (s + pos - namelength - offset, namelength, true, s, pos, lineno, linecharno);
> +      return pos;

   I don't understand why you need to overwrite s[pos - offset -1]
   with the null byte: the same effect could be obtained by adjusting
   the POS argument passed to make_tag.  Also, you in effect chop off
   the last character of NAME, but don't adjust NAMELENGTH
   accordingly.  These factors together cause make_tag to decide that
   an explicitly-named tag is in order, because name[namelength-1] is
   a null byte, which is rejected as being "not-a-name" character.

   To fix this second issue, I propose the change below, which should
   be applied on top of your patches:

diff --git a/lib-src/etags.c b/lib-src/etags.c
index 370e825..2b0288e 100644
--- a/lib-src/etags.c
+++ b/lib-src/etags.c
@@ -6585,10 +6585,8 @@ mercury_pr (char *s, char *last, ptrdiff_t lastlen)
 	     && c_isspace (s[pos - namelength - offset]))
 	--offset;
 
-      /* There is no need to correct namelength or call notinname.  */
-      s[pos - offset - 1] = '\0';
-
-      make_tag (s + pos - namelength - offset, namelength, true, s, pos, lineno, linecharno);
+      make_tag (s + pos - namelength - offset, namelength - 1, true,
+		s, pos - offset - 1, lineno, linecharno);
       return pos;
     }
 
I've verified that etags after this change still produces the correct
TAGS file, including for the file univ.m you sent up-thread.

Do you agree with the changes I propose?  If not, could you please
explain what I miss here?





  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-17 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <mailman.12421.1623412982.2554.bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2021-06-14 15:10 ` bug#47408: [PATCH] Etags support for Mercury -- fix explicit tags for existentially-quantified procedures fabrice nicol
2021-06-14 16:04   ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-14 17:10     ` fabrice nicol
2021-06-14 17:42       ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-14 18:52         ` fabrice nicol
2021-06-17 10:50           ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2021-06-17 11:19             ` Fabrice Nicol
2021-06-17 11:42               ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-17 18:36                 ` fabrice nicol
2021-06-18 11:29                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-18 11:54                     ` Francesco Potortì
2021-06-18 12:33                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-06-18 13:53                         ` fabrice nicol

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83y2b8zrxa.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=47408@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=fabrnicol@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).