unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Cc: 12872@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#12872: 24.2; Provide a feature to trigger mode-line redisplay
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 15:02:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83y24x28f4.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lf0ynugo.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon,  06 Dec 2021 07:00:39 +0100)

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: 12872@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2021 07:00:39 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > How would that be different from what force-mode-line-update does now?
> > It sets the update_mode_line flag for the window's buffer, not just
> > for the window, and it also sets a flag to prevent redisplay
> > optimizations that could get in the way of the mode-line update.  What
> > do you suggest to do instead, and why would that be useful?
> 
> Somebody said earlier:
> 
> > force-mode-line-update is a blunt weapon, and causes a much more
> > thorough redisplay than its name says.
> 
> If this isn't accurate, then I guess there's nothing to do here.

Somebody else explained earlier the "blunt" part:

> > The problem with the update_mode_line flags is that they are
> > indiscriminate: the mode line shows a lot of data, each one of it
> > changes at different frequencies and due to different triggers.  If we
> > want a finer resolution there, we need to make these flags not just
> > simple booleans, but enumerations with several values, or maybe
> > bitmaps.  Then redisplay_window could be smarter about redrawing parts
> > of the mode line.
> 
> I think redrawing parts of the mode line would be more work than it's
> worth.

Then I guess we should close this as wontfix.





  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-06 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-12 18:27 bug#12872: 24.2; Provide a feature to trigger mode-line redisplay Eli Zaretskii
2012-11-12 19:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-11-12 22:17   ` Drew Adams
2012-11-13  3:57     ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-11-13 15:38       ` Drew Adams
2021-12-04  4:46 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-12-04  7:54   ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-12-04 18:55     ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-12-04 19:26       ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-12-04 19:40         ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-12-04 19:43           ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-12-04 22:04             ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-12-05  7:02               ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-12-05 20:05                 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-12-05 20:14                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-12-06  6:00                     ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-12-06 13:02                       ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2021-12-07 20:49                         ` Lars Ingebrigtsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83y24x28f4.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=12872@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=larsi@gnus.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).