From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61667: 29.0.60; Failure to redisplay Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 18:05:14 +0200 Message-ID: <83y1orrolh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <04d7cb31-684c-07c0-ee7b-503514fc1a85@yandex.ru> <87a617eanz.fsf@yahoo.com> <4306cb76-a44c-3101-e43c-fd64afae4a51@yandex.ru> <871qmje2ws.fsf@yahoo.com> <83edqjtbss.fsf@gnu.org> <4e5e2a46-9b07-206a-6774-9f98f34cbd14@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="404"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, 61667@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 21 17:44:53 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pUVl7-000AVr-57 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 17:44:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUV9e-0002Ac-K5; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:06:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUV9W-00028i-GD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:06:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUV9W-0008EK-7W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:06:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pUV9V-0006U9-NG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:06:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 16:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61667 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61667-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61667.167699555424914 (code B ref 61667); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 16:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61667) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2023 16:05:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57114 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pUV9O-0006Tm-8n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:05:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37990) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pUV9M-0006TX-3z for 61667@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:05:53 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([209.51.188.10]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUV9F-0007yc-AL; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:05:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=s8lCJSyaoaW0uRZ9x31N3yb8wE6ruB/QJRWURm0tJEs=; b=qaf7gUHdV+6a /PfnfqO8nTEElIxbBE7IdJ90ZP8ugkwzyhdgbmWrh5TyuJYJ7MgknHBzAPnM5ef0N5guE5tt17vSX ItNnl8/PKrQJvS+y01CydHLA6L6aDfGR5qgBPNGzLc7SylIu6KMzghmj9XSogEGQD/lMioW9ufSU3 o/flEdqbBnr5fUMRTESzMi1fy+3MGcU16c9Snioiw85ImOLEEPnE/ucU/46K9f2yXyVGrnanpCtrD Wa2lmEjQCcALZfxUTTNpjQOTWo7NnPs5eY2ORqV42x+lt48OD7jk2aOsXkg/CWk/z/4awHUQcHo9+ u7WWhqJE3L7yfKCQxfDKDw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pUV8Z-0002Y6-Vs; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:05:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4e5e2a46-9b07-206a-6774-9f98f34cbd14@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Tue, 21 Feb 2023 17:51:01 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:256298 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 17:51:01 +0200 > Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, 61667@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > > > If you build with no optimizations (CFLAGS=-O0 ./configure...), but > > without --enable-checking=glyphs, does the problem still happen? > > Still reproduces, yes. As long as I don't hurry too much to type 'C-x b > file-name RET' too early, before the frame has managed to resize and > redisplay fully the first time. I'm not surer I follow: why should a frame resize in this case? You just visit a file in an existing window of an existing frame, right? Or is the situation more complicated? If the latter, please tell the details, they could be relevant. > So if I wait for it, and then use 'C-x b' (with Ido's support for > recentf), then I also can trigger the problem. Not following again: wait for what? And what happens when you use "C-x b"? > Oh, here's another description of the bug: the frame's title bar changes > (to display the visited file name), but the buffer is blank for a little > while. Which seems to mean that redisplay was called (and produced the updated frame title), but for some reason decided that none of the windows need redrawing. Or (given your report about double-buffering) didn't reflect the new content on display?