From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7560: 24.0.50; 'bzr status' blocking making of GNU Emacs Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:06:01 +0200 Message-ID: <83wrnm3ena.fsf@gnu.org> References: <694A126E-27F9-4CFA-9F86-1CEDD1EBF191@Freenet.DE> <831v5w3z0g.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291662999 9696 80.91.229.12 (6 Dec 2010 19:16:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7560@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 06 20:16:31 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPgY2-0001SO-4O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:16:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60961 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PPgY1-0006do-Dz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:16:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49692 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PPgX1-000674-Ky for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:15:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PPgX0-00025n-Fo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:15:27 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47225) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PPgX0-00025i-EC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:15:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPgJ3-00012q-Ll; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:01:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7560.12916620061326 (code B ref 7560); Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:01:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2010 19:00:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPgIA-0000LD-C7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:00:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPgI6-0000Ik-M1 for 7560@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:00:04 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LD000L00T0NLW00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 7560@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:05:55 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.69.203]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LD000KZMT1TJD70@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:05:54 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:01:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:42219 Archived-At: > Cc: 7560@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:54:07 -0500 > > Anyway, to me, the question is: why is the build process running bzr > status at all. Because many file ops, in particular save-buffer, in a versioned directory do that automatically.