From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9960: Compiling Emacs trunk with MSVC Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:51:02 +0200 Message-ID: <83wrau9lqx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sjy5279e.fsf@gnu.org> <8339e2lsu7.fsf@gnu.org> <83zkgakdby.fsf@gnu.org> <4EB5320F.5090800@gmail.com> <83vcqyk8k3.fsf@gnu.org> <4EB540F4.7080106@gmail.com> <83r51mk62f.fsf@gnu.org> <86wrbeo7p5.fsf@googlemail.com> <83k47ejyyt.fsf@gnu.org> <86sjm2o559.fsf@googlemail.com> <86obwqo2hl.fsf@googlemail.com> <86ipmynwds.fsf@googlemail.com> <838vnujm3z.fsf@gnu.org> <83sjlzj25l.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321847643 2225 80.91.229.12 (21 Nov 2011 03:54:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, fabrice.popineau@supelec.fr, 9960@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 21 04:53:58 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSKxC-0003qn-9e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:53:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52551 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSKxB-0006RB-D3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 22:53:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44729) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSKx8-0006R3-Go for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 22:53:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSKx5-0006db-V8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 22:53:54 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58032) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSKx5-0006dU-SP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 22:53:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSKyE-0006e0-ED for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 22:55:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9960 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9960-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9960.132184766625494 (code B ref 9960); Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9960) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2011 03:54:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSKxd-0006d9-QK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 22:54:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSKxa-0006cY-BB for 9960@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 22:54:24 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LUZ00A00RL5MJ00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 9960@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:53:08 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.237.133]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LUZ00APPS439Y90@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:53:00 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 22:55:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54110 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:45:06 +0100 > Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, Fabrice Popineau , > 9960@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 03:30, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > > I'm not sure I understand the question, but IIUC the answer is that > > `long' is 64bit on all known 64bit POSIX systems. > > OK, let me rephrase the question to Fabrice (I thought that he meant > that there was some typedef or macro that he had to change, not > variables directly declared to be long): > > Why it is a problem to "switch long to something that is 64 bits long > on a 64-bit architecture"? What is the problem exactly? The hidden assumption is that a long and a pointer are of the same width. This is true on 32-bit hosts and on 64-bit Posix hosts (which have the LP64 architecture), but not on 64-bit Windows, where long is a 32-bit data type, but a pointer is 64-bit wide.