From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10304: 24.0.92: display bug Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:36:13 +0200 Message-ID: <83wqvr8rci.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8762hihrj7.fsf@live.com> <8362gnhp9b.fsf@gnu.org> <8338yfamvk.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1357407415 6600 80.91.229.3 (5 Jan 2013 17:36:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:36:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10304@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 05 18:37:12 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TrXgE-0002ql-IT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:37:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35438 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrXfz-0004t4-2j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:36:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52599) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrXfw-0004sn-3u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:36:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrXfs-0001xz-PD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:36:52 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34849) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrXfs-0001xo-LX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:36:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TrXg5-0007Ft-KB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:37:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10304 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10304-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10304.135740739627877 (code B ref 10304); Sat, 05 Jan 2013 17:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10304) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2013 17:36:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45098 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TrXfc-0007Fa-Ka for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:36:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:46940) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TrXfW-0007FQ-2f for 10304@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:36:31 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MG500C00WRGK600@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 10304@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:36:10 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MG500CE9Y88K090@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:36:09 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:69414 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 10304@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:38:07 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > According to this, the window had 70 lines, of which 43 displayed > > text; that text was comprised of empty lines, except for the 2nd line > > which displayed the text "Link "; and point was on that 2nd line. > > Does that sound reasonable? > > Yes, the only text in the buffer was the Link thing, and that was > probably on the second line. However, the window was (let's see) 43 > lines tall. > > The image was (faultily) displayed right below the Link. Could you describe in more detail what happened to cause the text at the end of the buffer be displayed instead of the image? Is it that the buffer included an image and also some text, and that buffer was scrolled such that the image went out of view and the text came into view? Or was it some other scenario, like maybe switching buffers in the window? Andreas, perhaps you also could give such details about your case? I think I see the code that could be the culprit, but I need to understand better how the new display replaced the old one, to dig deeper. TIA