From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19443: 25.0.50; `info-display-manual' could limit the choice to currently visited manuals if given a prefix arg for convenience Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 23:55:38 +0200 Message-ID: <83wq5ekrdx.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1419630978 13253 80.91.229.3 (26 Dec 2014 21:56:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 21:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19443@debbugs.gnu.org To: Filipp Gunbin Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 26 22:56:11 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4cri-0003jT-9i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 22:56:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54475 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4crh-0002Gy-Q6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:56:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36199) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4cre-0002Gt-PJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:56:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4cra-0003ur-MF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:56:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49085) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4cra-0003un-Ig for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4cra-0000BT-Ak for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 21:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19443 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19443-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19443.1419630945678 (code B ref 19443); Fri, 26 Dec 2014 21:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19443) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2014 21:55:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58451 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4crI-0000Ar-4E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:55:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:46445) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y4crF-0000Ai-Ak for 19443@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 16:55:42 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NH700B00L21MA00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for 19443@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 23:51:52 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NH700EC5M2FXY00@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 23:51:52 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:97743 Archived-At: > From: Filipp Gunbin > Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 20:06:45 +0300 > > Here's the patch on the subject. I'll apply it if no one objects. Fine with me, thanks. One minor comment about the doc string: you are talking about "the choice", but no choice was mentioned before in the doc string. This might confuse the user. I think you should mention completion in order to make this clear.