From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19981: 24.4; Flaws in Eshell Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 18:34:34 +0200 Message-ID: <83wq2zqrxh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <54F48A7D.4090904@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1425314131 28821 80.91.229.3 (2 Mar 2015 16:35:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 16:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19981@debbugs.gnu.org To: Chen Xiaodong Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 02 17:35:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YSTJL-0006yY-B4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 17:35:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58040 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSTJK-00009c-Mn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:35:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41038) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSTJD-00005n-R8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:35:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSTJ8-0005J6-PE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:35:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59078) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSTJ8-0005IT-LR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YSTJ7-0006Zl-PV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:35:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 16:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19981 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19981-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19981.142531409325259 (code B ref 19981); Mon, 02 Mar 2015 16:35:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19981) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2015 16:34:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34443 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YSTIz-0006ZL-8I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:34:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:54269) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YSTIx-0006Yz-1K for 19981@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:34:52 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NKL00100F4CJN00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 19981@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 18:34:44 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NKL0014NFDVJR10@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 18:34:44 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <54F48A7D.4090904@gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99964 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 00:06:21 +0800 > From: Chen Xiaodong > > > Compared with the command "dir" in shells of Window 2000/XP/7, as a > novice to Eshell, I think there are big inconveniences in it. > (1)I can't get only directories listed with "ls -d" ("dir /ad" in > Windows), likewise, can't get only files listed("dir /a-d" in Windows). > (2)I can't find out how many files there are and how much diskspace > available with "ls" nor "du". These two items usually comes with "dir" > in Windows. > > Should there be some improvements? You can have all that in Eshell with "cmd /c dir ...". The built-in Eshell commands emulate their Unix namesakes, so they present features in those commands.