From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20629: 25.0.50; Regression: TAGS broken, can't find anything in C++ files. Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 18:46:54 +0300 Message-ID: <83wpzuxbtd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <555EC552.5010600@swipnet.se> <55606A8F.1020109@swipnet.se> <55606CC7.3010401@yandex.ru> <55606F70.10605@swipnet.se> <83twv31jzg.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5r1hdx.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw0v1e5n.fsf@gnu.org> <83lhgczo16.fsf@gnu.org> <55639175.9090005@yandex.ru> <83fv6kysjf.fsf@gnu.org> <556447EF.3050103@yandex.ru> <83bnh7z8c5.fsf@gnu.org> <5564C2C7.5050909@yandex.ru> <837frvywfn.fsf@gnu.org> <55650812.60909@yandex.ru> <831ti2yu1a.fsf@gnu.org> <5565E28A.5040507@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432741702 12819 80.91.229.3 (27 May 2015 15:48:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 15:48:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 27 17:48:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YxdYx-0000cX-AD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 17:48:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54452 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxdYw-0008Hp-Po for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 11:48:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43573) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxdYs-0008HZ-3c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 11:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxdYo-0004ZJ-Po for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 11:48:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48560) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxdYo-0004ZA-M7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 11:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YxdYo-0003Cd-6K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 11:48:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 15:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20629 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20629-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20629.143274166012279 (code B ref 20629); Wed, 27 May 2015 15:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20629) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 May 2015 15:47:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58535 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YxdYR-0003Bx-Mq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 11:47:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:40136) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YxdYO-0003Bh-8f for 20629@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 11:47:38 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NP000C00MGT3Y00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 20629@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 May 2015 18:47:02 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NP000C9CMIE3810@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 27 May 2015 18:47:02 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <5565E28A.5040507@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103225 Archived-At: > Cc: 20629@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 18:28:10 +0300 > > On 05/27/2015 05:28 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > That's not the same situation: [()=,;] are used only if there's no > > explicit tag name; > > tag-implicit-name-match-p is used either way. Maybe I'm confused, but what about tag-exact-match-p? > > By contrast, what you are suggesting (AFAIU) is process an explicit > > tag name, such as "foo::bar::baz", to deduce that it matches "baz". > > No, to process patterns. I don't think we've ever had qualified explicit > tag names, did we? Yes, we did. That's what the -Q switch controls. > > Or maybe I don't understand the suggestion, since you were talking > > about tag-implicit-name-match-p, which doesn't look at the explicit > > tag name at all, and the explicit tag name is the root cause here. > > Running 'etags -Q', and updating tag-implicit-name-match-p to also > include : in NONAM should both show us the qualified names in the > completion table, as well match the unqualified names when asked for tags. I guess I really don't understand your suggestion, then.