From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9130: Document Lisp mode fontification for strings after :documentation Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 20:47:00 +0200 Message-ID: <83wpsez0wr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y4cuz3er.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1450291642 16503 80.91.229.3 (16 Dec 2015 18:47:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9130@debbugs.gnu.org To: Shakthi Kannan Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 16 19:47:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a9H6W-0000wu-2R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:47:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48815 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9H6V-0005ed-FI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:47:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9H6R-0005eN-MZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:47:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9H6M-0000qZ-Nc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:47:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46227) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9H6M-0000qQ-KH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9H6M-0003r4-D0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9130 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.145029161814808 (code B ref -1); Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2015 18:46:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53829 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9H6I-0003qm-1s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:46:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48921) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a9H6G-0003qX-4e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:46:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9H69-0000oo-TA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:46:50 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:38356) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9H69-0000oj-Q1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:46:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39879) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9H68-0005ce-Tj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:46:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9H63-0000o2-Uk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:46:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41793) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9H63-0000ny-Rf; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:46:43 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4947 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1a9H63-0005MD-66; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:46:43 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Shakthi Kannan on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 23:37:08 +0530) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:110059 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 23:37:08 +0530 > From: Shakthi Kannan > Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > > --- > | Also, you are marking this as documented, but in what manual did you > | find this documented? The original commit that added this feature > | didn't include any documentation changes. > \-- > > Since, the patch has made the documentation updated in NEWS file, I > marked it as '+++'. How else should I mark it? No, that's a misunderstanding. The NEWS entries that are not marked by either "+++" or "---" (and the corresponding code) need to be considered as basis for updating one of the Emacs manuals. The "+++" mark means the corresponding manual has been updated. IOW, the unmarked entries in NEWS are hints for updating the manuals due to changes since the last release. They should be expanded, enriched with whatever you pick up from the doc strings and the code itself, and described in the appropriate manual. Sorry, I think that was clear. Thanks.