From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26126: 26.0.50; file-notify-rm-watch removes arbitrary watches Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 18:13:19 +0200 Message-ID: <83wpbh5ly8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r31x9ulw.fsf@luca> <87shmcney8.fsf@detlef> <87efxw7xvc.fsf@luca> <87mvcjophx.fsf@detlef> <87tw6rssoi.fsf@luca> <87pohfkmvh.fsf@detlef> <87lgs2sobr.fsf@luca> <87y3w2gywc.fsf@detlef> <878to21fty.fsf@luca> <87wpbl1u80.fsf@detlef> <87d1ddecx2.fsf@luca> <87efxtnk8m.fsf@detlef> <87tw6nd6nf.fsf@luca> <871strm323.fsf@detlef> <838tnywshh.fsf@gnu.org> <8737e54f8c.fsf@detlef> <838tnx71u0.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3vx2tdi.fsf@detlef> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490200633 4037 195.159.176.226 (22 Mar 2017 16:37:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:37:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 26126@debbugs.gnu.org, politza@hochschule-trier.de To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 22 17:37:09 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqjFm-0007rl-9N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:36:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52209 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqjFs-0007UA-E0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:37:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40801) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqitk-0005Dp-3v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:14:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqite-0006ub-FE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:14:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqite-0006uX-CT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqite-0004sy-86 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26126 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26126-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26126.149019921218734 (code B ref 26126); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26126) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2017 16:13:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39626 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqitA-0004s6-8j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:13:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49371) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqit9-0004rv-Ib for 26126@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:13:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqit0-0006XO-BI for 26126@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:13:26 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46803) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cqit0-0006XF-81; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:13:22 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1200 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cqisz-0002TF-G9; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:13:21 -0400 In-reply-to: <87y3vx2tdi.fsf@detlef> (message from Michael Albinus on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:01:13 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:130812 Archived-At: > From: Michael Albinus > Cc: politza@hochschule-trier.de, 26126@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:01:13 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> I've tried to implement remote handlers to behave exactly like the > >> local ones. That's the Tramp philosophy. > > > > Right, but in this case there are 2 flavors of local handlers, and the > > question is on which of them to model the remote ones. > > IIRC, it was driven by you to let all handlers behave like directory > monitors. Yes, that's right. But I was surely only thinking about local handlers. > II also RC, there was the idea to offer another function, which returns > the type of a monitor, being a file monitor or a directory monitor. This > idea was given up after all monitors were forced to behave like a > directory monitor; prior the existence of kqueue. Maybe we shall rethink > about this idea? Is this of practical use? I wouldn't start working on this before there's a real need. Thanks.