From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26274: 26.0.50; completion regression Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 05:33:22 +0300 Message-ID: <83wpb75w99.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zig756p8.fsf@rosalinde> <87a886wuyi.fsf@rosalinde> <87lgroyq4x.fsf@rosalinde> <8337dw6ljs.fsf@gnu.org> <87h92cym36.fsf@rosalinde> <878tnnzwdg.fsf@rosalinde> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490841259 1399 195.159.176.226 (30 Mar 2017 02:34:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 02:34:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 26274@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Stephen Berman , Michal Nazarewicz Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 30 04:34:12 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPua-0007WW-6a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 04:34:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33382 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPue-0005Dz-Hc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57966) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPuV-0005Dt-Vd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:34:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPuU-0008Uk-Sd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53587) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPuU-0008Ub-PQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPuU-0008DA-IB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 02:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26274 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26274-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26274.149084121631528 (code B ref 26274); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 02:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26274) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2017 02:33:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51786 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPu3-0008CS-WD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:33:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38497) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPu2-0008CB-Br for 26274@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:33:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPtu-00087b-3a for 26274@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:33:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51505) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPtu-00087S-0T; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:33:26 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4103 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPtt-0000Wk-2T; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:33:25 -0400 In-reply-to: <878tnnzwdg.fsf@rosalinde> (message from Stephen Berman on Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:00:27 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:131078 Archived-At: > From: Stephen Berman > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 26274@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:00:27 +0200 > > > Starting from a fresh checkout like Eli suggested is the safest way, > > but I guess you should be able to get around this error by deleting > > 'Makefile', and regenerating it by running ./configure again. > > Thanks, I went this route, and it worked (and still took almost an hour > to go through eight iterations). Git bisect in fact pinpointed this > commit: > > 5ec3a58462e99533ea5200de356302181d634d0b is the first bad commit > commit 5ec3a58462e99533ea5200de356302181d634d0b > Author: Michal Nazarewicz > Date: Mon Sep 19 00:23:40 2016 +0200 > > Generate upcase and downcase tables from Unicode data (bug#24603) > > Use Unicode data to generate case tables instead of mostly repeating > them in lisp code. Do that in a way which maps ‘Dz’ (and similar) > digraph to ‘dz’ when down- and ‘DZ’ when upcasing. > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?msg=89;bug=24603 lists all > changes to syntax table and case tables introduced by this commit. > > * lisp/international/characters.el: Remove case-pairs defined with > explicit Lisp code and instead use Unicode character properties. > > * test/src/casefiddle-tests.el (casefiddle-tests--characters, > casefiddle-tests-casing): Update test cases which are now working > as they should. > > (When Eli listed this as a candidate, I doubted it because of the date, > since my build from February 8 of this year does not have the problem. > I guess that date is not the commit date. Confusing when looking at the > commit log.) The commit date is Feb 15. This commit came from a feature branch, so the date you see in the log I show is the original commit date on that branch. Michal, could you please take a look at this?