From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31271: 25.2; exported deleted RMAIL emails should have theit deleted flag reset Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 17:59:48 +0300 Message-ID: <83wovd9t3v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83o9hcgf0h.fsf@gnu.org> <83po19ec1r.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1528210729 32170 195.159.176.226 (5 Jun 2018 14:58:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 14:58:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 31271@debbugs.gnu.org To: Francesco =?UTF-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 05 16:58:44 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQDQ4-0008GA-Ak for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 16:58:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47364 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQDSB-0000pc-Eu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 11:00:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52021) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQDRO-0000Ar-Er for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 11:00:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQDRK-0007qy-M5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 11:00:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQDRK-0007qs-Iq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 11:00:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQDRK-00024A-8x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 11:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 15:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31271 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31271-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31271.15282107917899 (code B ref 31271); Tue, 05 Jun 2018 15:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31271) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2018 14:59:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35311 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQDR9-00023L-1m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 10:59:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60917) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fQDR7-000237-B4 for 31271@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 10:59:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQDR1-0007bQ-Ci for 31271@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 10:59:44 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45207) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fQDQv-0007S9-IR; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 10:59:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3880 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fQDQv-00078D-1b; Tue, 05 Jun 2018 10:59:37 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Francesco =?UTF-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= on Mon, 04 Jun 2018 18:59:12 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:147018 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 18:59:12 +0200 > From: Francesco Potortì > Cc: 31271@debbugs.gnu.org > > Sorry for the delay, I am submerged by work... Happens to all of us. > I just tried it and it seems to work, thanks. > > I deleted an email, I then output it to an mbox file which I was not > visiting. Whan I opend it, the mail was there, and was not deleted. > Its flags are > > X-RMAIL-ATTRIBUTES: -----S-- > > But I don't know what it means. That attribute means the message was forwarded. See rmail-attr-array and rmail-forwarded-attr-index. What about the question I asked: > What about invoking 'o' with a prefix argument -- should it stop > ignoring deleted messages when it looks for the N-1 additional > messages to output to a file, when this option is set non-nil? The code I posted still ignores deleted messages, except for the message that is current when the command is invoked. Is that reasonable? Thanks.