From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34394: 27.0.50; Emacs segfaults with SLY, company and C-g Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 17:51:48 +0200 Message-ID: <83wom9m02z.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87va1tye42.fsf@gmail.com> <83wom9o0hu.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2chxpli.fsf@gmail.com> <83k1i9nugh.fsf@gnu.org> <87mun5xko7.fsf@gmail.com> <83h8ddnouf.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftsxnnug.fsf@gnu.org> <87bm3lxgr4.fsf@gmail.com> <83ef8hnm38.fsf@gnu.org> <877ee9xfid.fsf@gmail.com> <83bm3lnkfh.fsf@gnu.org> <8736oxxdsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87va1tvz54.fsf@gmail.com> <87r2chvylb.fsf@gmail.com> <831s4hng19.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="149698"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34394@debbugs.gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 09 16:53:10 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gsUwI-000cq4-80 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 16:53:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46969 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsUwH-0006UP-9h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:53:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsUwB-0006UJ-DU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:53:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsUwA-00056U-Kr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:53:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42178) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsUwA-00056J-HL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gsUwA-0004pz-Ef for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:53:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 15:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34394 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34394-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34394.154972753918548 (code B ref 34394); Sat, 09 Feb 2019 15:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34394) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2019 15:52:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41459 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gsUvS-0004p5-RS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:52:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50482) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gsUvP-0004or-W1 for 34394@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:52:17 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52240) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsUvJ-0004J9-UV; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:52:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4910 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gsUvJ-0003IV-F0; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:52:09 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= on Sat, 9 Feb 2019 15:37:23 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155318 Archived-At: > From: João Távora > Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2019 15:37:23 +0000 > Cc: 34394@debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Schwab > > > Is it possible that somehow sit_for is called recursively in this > > scenario? If you put a breakpoint in sit_for, does it break when bt > > shows another instance of sit_for up the call-stack? > > > > We need to establish who clobbers the jump_buf being used to implement > > quitting by C-g. > > The problem is that if I place a breakpoint there I can't work with company > at all. So I can't reproduce the problem. Try a breakpoint that automatically continues the program, after it displays the backtrace. Like this: (gdb) break sit_for .... (gdb) commands > bt > continue > end