From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36250: [PATCH] Improve a bit frame-resize-pixelwise documentation Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 17:22:28 +0300 Message-ID: <83woh5hjrv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1560707992.19774.0@yandex.ru> <20190618203502.31223-1-Hi-Angel@yandex.ru> <1561730385.29740.0@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="123301"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 36250@debbugs.gnu.org To: Konstantin Kharlamov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 28 16:57:33 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hgsJg-000VuV-Qf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:57:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32852 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgsJf-0006IC-0a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 10:57:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39764) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgrnH-0000gF-MU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 10:24:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgrnG-0003Hr-Fn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 10:24:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57426) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgrnG-0003Hi-9f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 10:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgrnG-0004kl-58 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 10:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 14:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36250 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36250-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36250.156173178918188 (code B ref 36250); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 14:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36250) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2019 14:23:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42737 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgrmO-0004jG-0n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 10:23:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33704) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgrmL-0004ic-JE for 36250@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 10:23:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56211) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgrmG-0002CI-79; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 10:23:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4516 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hgrmD-0007uW-Ii; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 10:23:00 -0400 In-reply-to: <1561730385.29740.0@yandex.ru> (message from Konstantin Kharlamov on Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:59:45 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:161727 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:59:45 +0300 > From: Konstantin Kharlamov > Cc: 36250@debbugs.gnu.org > > > I think you read "resize a frame" and "set the size of a frame" as > > referring to the same operation. But they aren't: the former is about > > changing the size of an existing frame with a mouse or with > > set-frame-size, whereas the latter is about doing other things that > > implicitly require the frame's size to have pixel resolution. > > > > So no, this is not repetition, and should not be removed. > > Right, but the 1st paragraph also says "If this is non-nil, […] frame > sizes can increase/decrease by one pixel". Yes, but it doesn't say you can _set_ the size at pixel granularity to begin with. > I.e. this says that setting the variable to non-nil makes further > operations on frames to have one-pixel resolution That's your interpretation, but the text doesn't say that, it says something slightly different. Thus the second paragraph is not repetition.