From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43519: 28.0.50; Overlay at end of minibuf hides minibuf's real content Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:14:09 +0300 Message-ID: <83wo0lx5ji.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wo0p1twr.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1qx1q9v.fsf@gnu.org> <838sd425l2.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuvrxlho.fsf@gnu.org> <83d02fxbs2.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10304"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 43519@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 22 16:15:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kKj4a-0002WI-5A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:15:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46582 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKj4Z-00064w-4S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:15:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45314) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKj4Q-00064j-UA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49457) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKj4Q-0005l5-E0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKj4Q-0005qO-8M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:15:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43519 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43519-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43519.160078405222390 (code B ref 43519); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43519) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2020 14:14:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32770 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKj3c-0005p2-65 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:14:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38274) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKj3a-0005or-PL for 43519@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:14:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50413) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKj3V-0005ff-8p; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:14:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3777 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kKj3U-0001Tl-JW; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:14:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Gregory Heytings on Tue, 22 Sep 2020 06:58:20 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:188689 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 06:58:20 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: Stefan Monnier , 43519@debbugs.gnu.org > > >>> For example: would it be okay to start the display at the beginning of > >>> the screen line where we end up after move_it_vertically_backward > >>> returns? > >> > >> Sounds reasonable. > > > > Thanks. if this is agreed upon, I will try to come up with a (tested) > > patch. > > I at least do not agree. I'm sorry that all my explanations and descriptions of the code didn't convince you. However, since this is my area of expertise, and my responsibility as a co-maintainer of Emacs, I must act in this case according to my understanding of what is right and what is the most beneficial for future Emacs development and maintenance.