From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43645: 26.3; emacsclient -c does not open to correct window Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 19:49:51 +0300 Message-ID: <83wo0fmafk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tuvjo82b.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh5byzr9.fsf@gnus.org> <834knjnquy.fsf@gnu.org> <87v9fzyyuw.fsf@gnus.org> <83zh5bmb6o.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfgvyxsr.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3514"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: bluetrack121@gmail.com, 43645@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 27 18:51:22 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZtS-0000nu-48 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 18:51:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50818 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZtR-0007ko-6o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:51:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40506) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZt9-0007kc-LR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:51:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZt8-000724-FO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:51:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZt8-0006ox-EH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 16:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43645 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43645-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43645.160122541526160 (code B ref 43645); Sun, 27 Sep 2020 16:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43645) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2020 16:50:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50325 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZsM-0006ns-Pk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:50:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33516) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZsL-0006ng-5u for 43645@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:50:13 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54215) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZsF-0006ns-Iq; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:50:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4448 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZsC-0005nO-M5; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:50:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lfgvyxsr.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 27 Sep 2020 18:44:20 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:189157 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: bluetrack121@gmail.com, 43645@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 18:44:20 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > So I think (a) this is a corner and unimportant use case, and (b) it > > probably has something to do with how we select a buffer to display > > when 2 buffers are already on display and the user requests to see one > > of them. > > Yes. And I was wrong -- the bug also appears in a C-x 2 split, not just > a C-x 3 split. Makes sense, because the two cases should be indistinguishable when selecting a buffer to show is concerned.