From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44303: 28.0.50; json-pretty-print-buffer creates spurious lock file Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 15:25:55 +0200 Message-ID: <83wnyoul24.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wnz9pd2j.fsf@runbox.com> <87o8kjhmg4.fsf@gnus.org> <83r1pfalc4.fsf@gnu.org> <874km9ffiv.fsf@gnus.org> <83h7q17901.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2jblyzg.fsf@runbox.com> <83wnyu4j57.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16900"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44303-done@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: simenheg@runbox.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 14 14:27:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kdva9-0004Gy-TJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 14:27:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40628 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdva8-0003Yk-VG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 08:27:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdva2-0003YQ-LD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 08:27:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38568) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdva2-0001tg-Bz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 08:27:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdva2-0004bk-8m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 08:27:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 13:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44303 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44303-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D44303.160536037517660 (code D ref 44303); Sat, 14 Nov 2020 13:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44303-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2020 13:26:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50114 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdvZH-0004am-KW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 08:26:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58096) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kdvZF-0004aY-WE for 44303-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 08:26:14 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kdvZA-0001bE-FQ; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 08:26:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2039 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kdvZ9-0001Kq-17; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 08:26:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <83wnyu4j57.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 09 Nov 2020 17:58:12 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:193276 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 17:58:12 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 44303@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > I wonder whether we should actually cherry-pick this to the release > > > branch. The original recipe doesn't trigger the problem there, but > > > that's because json-pretty-print-buffer does modify the buffer on > > > emacs-27. If it didn't, we'd probably have the same problem in Emacs > > > 27. > > > > Right. You can see the bug in Emacs 27 too by using a test file like > > this instead: > > > > { > > } > > OK, will cherry-pick. Now done.