From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45319: 28.0.50; Redisplay: `forward-char' moves backwards into invisible text Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 17:38:26 +0200 Message-ID: <83wnxcsd1p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sg82tjf6.fsf@web.de> <838s9uupnr.fsf@gnu.org> <87ft42m47c.fsf@web.de> <83v9cyt4ty.fsf@gnu.org> <87bleqm1yq.fsf@web.de> <83sg82t2cg.fsf@gnu.org> <877dpem0dm.fsf@web.de> <83r1nmt08a.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7ogykgf.fsf@web.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17724"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jonas@bernoul.li, 45319-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 20 16:39:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kr0nc-0004V6-O9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 16:39:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34286 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kr0nb-0005h1-RZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 10:39:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34492) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kr0nW-0005gN-9h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 10:39:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33819) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kr0nW-00065E-1U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 10:39:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kr0nV-0007aF-VN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 10:39:01 -0500 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 15:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 45319 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 45319@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, michael_heerdegen@web.de Original-Received: via spool by 45319-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D45319.160847873429134 (code D ref 45319); Sun, 20 Dec 2020 15:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45319-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Dec 2020 15:38:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45364 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kr0nO-0007Zq-Ex for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 10:38:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41326) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kr0nM-0007Zd-GK for 45319-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 10:38:52 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kr0nG-00060j-8V; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 10:38:46 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3324 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kr0nF-000461-Dz; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 10:38:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87h7ogykgf.fsf@web.de> (message from Michael Heerdegen on Sun, 20 Dec 2020 09:01:52 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:196474 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Cc: 45319@debbugs.gnu.org, jonas@bernoul.li > Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 09:01:52 +0100 > > I see now that that problem has been discussed in Bug#23079. If you > think that everything is alright with my test case you might close this > bug and probably merge with that one. I closed this one. Merging them is too much of a hassle with debbugs's unhelpful defaults for archived bugs. The only other thing I could say, which may or may not be helpful for your use case, is that Lisp programs shouldn't assume they will always find point outside of invisible portion of the text, and instead actively look for the first visible position after point.