From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47860: 28.0.50; Mini buffer resize when lines are truncated regression Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 16:10:26 +0300 Message-ID: <83wnsys9ml.fsf@gnu.org> References: <835z0kulkq.fsf@gnu.org> <83blabtqqz.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6833"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 47860@debbugs.gnu.org, aaronjensen@gmail.com To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 19 15:11:15 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lYTgG-0001YY-27 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:11:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51038 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYTgF-0002sB-0l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:11:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43538) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYTg6-0002nS-J0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37214) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYTg6-0001JW-8N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lYTg6-00059k-3O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47860 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47860-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47860.161883785319807 (code B ref 47860); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 13:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47860) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Apr 2021 13:10:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48760 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lYTfx-00059O-6M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:10:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59064) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lYTfv-00059B-3U for 47860@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:10:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40097) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYTfp-00017l-AK; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:10:45 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1994 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lYTfo-0001A4-Aa; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 09:10:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Gregory Heytings on Mon, 19 Apr 2021 12:40:12 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:204444 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 12:40:12 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: Eli Zaretskii , 47860@debbugs.gnu.org > > Thanks. But what do you expect this code to do? I tested it, and for > Emacs 24 to 27 you see only "a" in the minibuffer. After commit > 56c42bd28d, you see two lines, "a" and "bbb...". Exactly the questions to which I would like to know the answers, thanks. IOW, given that the current code does "somewhat" better than everything we had before, what exactly is the problem you (Aaron) see with the offending commit that you call it "regression"?