From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1305: All code that currently beeps should use visual bell instead Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 20:34:34 +0300 Message-ID: <83wnsvpmmt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87blabpy54.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf9eo3mq.fsf@gnus.org> <0d7924a2-d09f-e2d0-f0e7-6b5ee3a7a7f2@yandex.ru> <192e82f20f5deb690394@heytings.org> <62fee2e3-8ae2-cbc9-9681-4d7f0fe680c0@yandex.ru> <192e82f20fb3cbebb89f@heytings.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11463"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: alan@idiocy.org, 1305@debbugs.gnu.org, mwd@md5i.com, stefan@marxist.se, jasonspiro4@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, dgutov@yandex.ru, larsi@gnus.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 21 19:36:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lZGlm-0002q0-Fj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:36:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35884 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZGll-0002nE-BK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:36:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49668) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZGld-0002n8-WA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48181) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZGld-0004a7-Op for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lZGld-0003l6-LV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 1305 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 1305-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B1305.161902650814381 (code B ref 1305); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1305) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2021 17:35:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59727 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lZGkf-0003jT-VE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36834) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lZGkb-0003j9-11 for 1305@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:35:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZGkS-0003nA-Mg; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:34:48 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1686 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lZGkR-0005tT-Vi; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:34:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <192e82f20fb3cbebb89f@heytings.org> (message from Gregory Heytings on Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:01:23 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:204645 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:01:23 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > Cc: Alan Third , 1305@debbugs.gnu.org, > Michael Welsh Duggan , Stefan Kangas , > jasonspiro4@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > Lars Ingebrigtsen > > > Anyway, speaking about other faces you could inherit from (for the echo > > area flash), how about 'highlight' instead of 'match'? > > > > Seems more appropriate. > > Yes, I noted that you'd prefer to use highlight instead of match, > presumably for a certain logical consistency. If highlight had been > yellow, that's what I would have done. IMO, we shouldn't use highlight for anything other than showing text sensitive to mouse or to cursor entry. That's what highlight was invented for, and using the same colors for an utterly different purpose is sub-optimal UI and UX.