From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48654: Overfull hbox, Unicode code points style (display.texi) Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 15:38:19 +0300 Message-ID: <83wnrlacw4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1b291257-516b-e751-1a7b-79823964ad16@gmail.com> <83lf82bufx.fsf@gnu.org> <5db3ff2d-1c26-35cb-084a-0ef3d48928a6@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35755"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 48654@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sebastian Urban Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 26 14:39:31 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1llsot-00092i-ET for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 14:39:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43550 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llsos-0007Uk-H9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 08:39:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40952) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llsoR-0007UK-PJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 08:39:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36288) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llsoQ-0006Yv-C7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 08:39:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llsoQ-0002v7-9m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 08:39:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 12:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48654 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48654-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48654.162203270511162 (code B ref 48654); Wed, 26 May 2021 12:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48654) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2021 12:38:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47832 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llsno-0002ty-Sw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 08:38:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47024) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llsnn-0002tj-8P for 48654@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2021 08:38:23 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60916) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llsni-00067s-1x; Wed, 26 May 2021 08:38:18 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2633 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llsnh-00041f-Ie; Wed, 26 May 2021 08:38:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5db3ff2d-1c26-35cb-084a-0ef3d48928a6@gmail.com> (message from Sebastian Urban on Wed, 26 May 2021 09:37:37 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:207286 Archived-At: > Cc: 48654@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Sebastian Urban > Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 09:37:37 +0200 > > >> As for Unicode code points it was decided to use "U+NNNN @sc{char > >> name}", so I adjusted all of them. > > > > Please use the exact names of the characters as they appear in the > > UnicodeData.txt file. > > Hmmm... which one is incorrect? I didn't say there were any, but I saw you were changing the names, and wanted to make sure you take the names from the official source. > > Also, why remove @code{..} from the "U+NNNN" notation -- what does > > that solve? > > Because, ~2 years ago you decided to follow Unicode docs notation, and > I'm just fixing the leftovers. See your commit: > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=f68b33f50299339a36da29cd1913d19fd5f288e0 OK, that just emphasizes the importance of providing the commit log message with reasoning when you propose a patch, TIA. > >> Finally, in a different file - FIXIT.TEXI - there is line 356, > >> where the word "dictionary" uses a discretionary hyphens - are they > >> used somewhere? Because, in the PDF there is no line breaking for > >> this sentence and if it's correct, perhaps adding this word to > >> DOCSTYLE.TEXI would be a better option. > > > > It depends on surrounding text: if the word gets close to a line > > break, we want it to break correctly. > > I don't know if it's a good idea to keep this just in case someone > changes the text in the future, or makes PDF using A5 page format. > Currently (official PDF), it's not close to a line break. What's the harm? > But if it stays, I suggest moving it to DOCSTYLE.TEXI, where other > problematic words are gathered below this line: > @c It turns out TeX sometimes fails to hyphenate, so we help it here > @hyphenation{...} Fine with me.