From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49261: 28.0.50; File Locking Breaks Presumptuous Toolchains Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 21:50:38 +0300 Message-ID: <83wnq2dkld.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o8bn7bie.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgv6vuon.fsf@gmx.de> <837di9lwbm.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6n5vuu4.fsf@gnus.org> <8735sqnmei.fsf@gnus.org> <834kd6f1dw.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7h6m1jh.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30216"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, ncaprisunfan@gmail.com, 49261@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 07 20:52:03 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m1CeR-0007ep-RO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 20:52:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38620 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m1CeQ-0008MS-Mn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 14:52:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36088) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m1CdS-0007DZ-MW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 14:51:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41919) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m1CdS-0001Ku-Fs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 14:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m1CdS-0007OY-E1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 14:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 18:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49261 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49261-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49261.162568383928378 (code B ref 49261); Wed, 07 Jul 2021 18:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49261) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jul 2021 18:50:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53464 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m1Cd5-0007Nd-2V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 14:50:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38176) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m1Cd0-0007NG-Jv for 49261@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 14:50:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41922) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m1Ccu-0001HH-Vn; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 14:50:28 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3844 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m1Ccu-0001ng-JF; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 14:50:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h7h6m1jh.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 07 Jul 2021 20:17:22 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:209615 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, ncaprisunfan@gmail.com, 49261@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 20:17:22 +0200 > > Hm... I think for simplicity's sake, it makes sense to always call the > Lisp code. Having two places where we insert ".#" into a file name just > seems error prone, long term. Btw, we could avoid having 2 places that produces the default ".#"+FILENAME lock file name by exposing to Lisp a C primitive which does that. So that problem can easily be solved.