From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32736: bug#34715: bug#32736: 26; Bind `C-x 5 2' to `clone-frame' by default Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 10:51:18 +0300 Message-ID: <83wnnzo1op.fsf@gnu.org> References: <17bef02b-7dd4-4086-828f-59488a836ac1@default> <8735qofx6h.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsuoqx75.fsf@gnu.org> <87eea8e9u6.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl5cquu4.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6kwe7n9.fsf@gnus.org> <875yvke7kt.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgswcsdq.fsf@gnus.org> <835yvkqtc3.fsf@gnu.org> <87v93kcrbu.fsf@gnus.org> <834kb4qof0.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0jzbew7.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14801"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 02 09:52:22 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhWI-0003cL-Es for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 09:52:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43672 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhWH-00034H-EE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 03:52:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhVz-00032F-TI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 03:52:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56305) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhVx-0000WE-Pr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 03:52:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhVx-0008Oi-ME for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 03:52:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 07:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 32736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32736.163056908832234 (code B ref 32736); Thu, 02 Sep 2021 07:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2021 07:51:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39616 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhVQ-0008Np-Al for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 03:51:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45146) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhVP-0008Na-Lk; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 03:51:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52130) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhVK-0008J8-DW; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 03:51:22 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2429 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLhVK-0000Kx-0t; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 03:51:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k0jzbew7.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 02 Sep 2021 09:44:24 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:213250 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 34715@debbugs.gnu.org, 32736@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 09:44:24 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Shouldn't we copy the parameters alist? Maybe even deep-copy? > > Do you mean in this particular test case or in `clone-frame'? If it's > the latter, the list we get is fresh (but not very deep). You mean, we get a fresh list because of the call to seq-filter? (Which btw means we now need to preload seq.el?) Is that guaranteed to return a copy of the original alist? And the faces aren't copied, I think, they reference the same faces the original frame had.