From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27544: 25.1; Visualization of Unicode bidirectional marks Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 19:53:54 +0200 Message-ID: <83wnkoqki5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sfvcapqd.fsf@gnus.org> <2C04D747-6772-4283-8455-39FEE767F61F@gnu.org> <87fsrc8goq.fsf@gnus.org> <8335ncs0z6.fsf@gnu.org> <87bl20jkg7.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8246"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 27544@debbugs.gnu.org, itai.berli@gmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 01 18:55:54 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1msTpi-0001wg-Di for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 18:55:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55498 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msTpg-0001OJ-Sf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:55:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38142) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msTos-0000xg-Rv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:55:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msTos-0002yY-Fx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:55:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1msTos-0002Lx-Ea for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:55:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 17:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27544 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 27544-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27544.16383812588964 (code B ref 27544); Wed, 01 Dec 2021 17:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27544) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Dec 2021 17:54:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45546 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1msToA-0002KW-6h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:54:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36826) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1msTo8-0002KK-Lt for 27544@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:54:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=33272 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msTo2-0002l8-LJ; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:54:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=uNZw9KYxJmtoCqQPqlhYuVZ3ixQNBeofnrfqAnSQzD0=; b=nFhOpW4S/KUy 3tbZGfBq2Ad3a37lUXDR1zBvhs06LCtuIRjBUrSqWPxvQSKeq4W/ukTOEmMNNWtjSWWkGIEdRhGj0 dLdK2CTFPrivHTUfABumlDhxSdCiBTj5ZvNlfzDsXf7MM1jdXAUjKoI0Mv8SNfZgrmjiDRnVIJ8BR Iw6EhgpO+IOYgBt81u0VgxqOAfSs2RyVX0Rv6zOBHNzh94oo3h/drk+6jrfOTXXlwhR0gDr17Bvkk mh/ATb5bJzVYwjrA52DzDlm8LUWTPBXjCjXCisJjXncAy5vuulpOgZcdIXev8bPp/PqKilsQNYPG3 /i/p1Q/mqP1AJIiROPEs8g==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3974 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msTo2-0001lW-DI; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:54:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87bl20jkg7.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 01 Dec 2021 18:36:56 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:221216 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: itai.berli@gmail.com, 27544@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 18:36:56 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Thanks. But wouldn't glyphless-hex-display-mode be a better name? > > glyphless-display-mode doesn't really say what it does to glyphless > > characters. > > It doesn't hexify the glyphs, it uses `acronym'. But I thought we might > allow that to be customised if somebody asks for it, which is why it's > not called `glyphless-acronym-display-mode'. But glyphless-display-mode has no mnemonic value. We already display glyphless characters, so this name doesn't help at all. Does anyone have suggestions for a better name?