From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#55414: 29.0.50; Byte compilation error for the modus-themes Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 15:26:57 +0300 Message-ID: <83wnelirxq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lev46l8y.fsf@protesilaos.com> <874k1qj4eo.fsf@gnus.org> <87lev296hl.fsf@protesilaos.com> <87zgjihlmw.fsf@gnus.org> <83zgjhiv8l.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13428"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, info@protesilaos.com, 55414@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 16 14:50:16 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nqaAx-0003Mr-NP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 14:50:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46674 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nqaAw-0006Rj-IG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:50:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42746) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nqZpU-00088m-NL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:28:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58127) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nqZpS-0007O2-Q4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nqZpS-0005ph-Mk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 12:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55414 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 55414-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55414.165270403922352 (code B ref 55414); Mon, 16 May 2022 12:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 55414) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2022 12:27:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52023 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nqZol-0005oS-JL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:27:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49364) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nqZoj-0005oD-Hg for 55414@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:27:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nqZod-0007MT-7o; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:27:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=qz0fBR3Kiw6famdqA/KOeFhdcURAw31sz3zgKw50+7U=; b=kU5Cnj4Nx3hE ERXvSsZrU59Nrz3i4CFa18KCeXPbSo1NTuEX0gdEX5lzK2Yl3dmOpCEf659UySO58otJ2aJaC6UIX N/1mfCEy737bwkUgkC06kDQUbYaZjGdZiJvjU4F8qQtj3WqYvUIVfoqs/ineh4OYCemifF0beDmYv GiCYFuWahbrYjmG5O1H5/L+PK7btpE0GLYNLOgMc2wFfYhuUo13VDe4qrIWIjEkIsCda4Ycnamad8 fyWMqwi78kiJZqp/Vlh5Od40AOaS9vg3Ly7jksXRUZ97IL0wFVEQsictQEQfYFTntWjNaJp6Ws2x6 Wcjva6wW0FFPkgzIXYb2/Q==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1439 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nqZob-00078b-UN; Mon, 16 May 2022 08:27:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Alan Mackenzie on Mon, 16 May 2022 12:03:05 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:232371 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 12:03:05 +0000 > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, info@protesilaos.com, 55414@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Alan Mackenzie > > > > If this compilation succeeds, then perhaps we need to increase our > > > default max-lisp-eval-depth. > > > But do we need to do that by default in Emacs, when the problem is > > local to this theme? Can't the package arrange for enlarging the > > threshold only for itself? > > We could. But I get the feeling that there are quite a lot of places > which increase max-lisp-eval-depth for their own use. Examples of those places? > Put another way, is there any overwhelming disadvantage to having a > larger default value of max-lisp-eval-depth, and possibly > max-specpdl-size? The disadvantage is that higher values prolong the time needed to detect real infinite recursions, and enlarge the probability of hitting C stack overflows, whose consequences are much more serious and harder to endure without losing the session and its edits.