From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49160: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Uninitialized inhibit_buffer_hooks Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 22:23:01 +0200 Message-ID: <83wn5slt22.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874kdratxt.fsf@dick> <83fsxaunxe.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6mijmrb.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfggx21q.fsf@tcd.ie> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26500"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 49160@debbugs.gnu.org, dick.r.chiang@gmail.com To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 11 21:23:17 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pFhcy-0006kS-QT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 21:23:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pFhcm-0006FN-6I; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:23:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pFhck-0006Ey-OL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pFhck-0003fT-E6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pFhck-0006iQ-4D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:23:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 20:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49160 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 49160-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49160.167346856225774 (code B ref 49160); Wed, 11 Jan 2023 20:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49160) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jan 2023 20:22:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43968 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pFhcP-0006he-Pf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:22:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39318) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pFhcL-0006hN-FX for 49160@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:22:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pFhcE-0003bX-FP; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:22:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=mltJyQM0Y3HzvQ51bFelVwBhr6m8rjIM467GCzpnJs0=; b=meEYuh9qP/xy m6edRCT6Hpm4+N1jDymb7DisONPl30w8KYIZP8RjUR0ZOuvJeXa1RSAsaCSz0CERLUaMwJ7mAGlhk xpd+65CtRK+Qx0oel6V5wq8Tn4s1x3LBeCgwwU8LaqBj6uDZ2sLDvTvAGqtjA2Wtu554HTMJx7iW4 ft/QvGQp8vRbPd0a5RpcgO4nzeR4SvkQgTbjGk6RSukjrqaKvMY1ojBIQGVtHB7Kyuv5467ukG9fK DioAzFU09Y+vOX5pxTZr1MdUro7ofIKG8JU4h46W6S5aWdniJu91DkTU1Nuy1EZbyXmc89eEKp9Px x4d4XmqoEDpcdR64SseQ7g==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pFhcD-0007K2-54; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:22:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87sfggx21q.fsf@tcd.ie> (contovob@tcd.ie) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:253166 Archived-At: > From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 49160@debbugs.gnu.org, dick > > Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 20:13:21 +0000 > > >> More to the point: since this attribute of a buffer cannot be changed > >> once the buffer is created, I think it might be okay to copy from the > >> base buffer, but we should also allow the caller to control that by > >> introducing an optional argument similar to that of get-buffer-create. > >> And if we do that, we could also consider making the default value be > >> nil, not necessarily a copy of that of the base buffer. > > > > I've now applied Dick's patch, and then adjusted as you suggest. > > Fmake_indirect_buffer continues to run buffer-list-update-hook > regardless of the new argument. Any objections to changing that? buffer-list-update-hook is not a buffer-hook, strictly speaking. So I'm not sure we want this. What is the real-life use case behind this request?