From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56682: feature/improved-locked-narrowing 9dee6df39c: Reworked locked narrowing. Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 09:39:22 +0200 Message-ID: <83wn4zurit.fsf@gnu.org> References: <166939872890.18950.12581667269687468681@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20221125175209.51166C004B6@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <6c9d91cffc1bfd801530@heytings.org> <6c9d91cffc394613f58a@heytings.org> <83eds0ksev.fsf@gnu.org> <8aadf0ddd54c85c8144a@heytings.org> <831qnhg3d9.fsf@gnu.org> <9757fbea37611e9c44b9@heytings.org> <83cz6yacxt.fsf@gnu.org> <6943e04e30e5a02a52e6@heytings.org> <838rhk5fy1.fsf@gnu.org> <6943e04e30a40824e107@heytings.org> <83k0143q37.fsf@gnu.org> <94821a0ef100102ac9e0@heytings.org> <83bkmdz04y.fsf@gnu.org> <43562d4dd9dffd81938f@heytings.org> <83357ozhx0.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34056"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 56682@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 03 08:40:31 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pNqgR-0008bS-ET for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 08:40:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNqgC-0000F3-1I; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 02:40:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNqfy-0000ER-Ha for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 02:40:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNqfy-0001xR-8I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 02:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pNqfx-0006ER-Tr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 02:40:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 07:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56682 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56682-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56682.167540996623899 (code B ref 56682); Fri, 03 Feb 2023 07:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56682) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2023 07:39:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36413 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pNqfN-0006DO-VB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 02:39:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33834) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pNqfM-0006D9-9w for 56682@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 02:39:24 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNqfH-0001nt-2N; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 02:39:19 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=v1U0U0FS+ymhS8NBSEvEKO7rbUcche8mofttHrb7+QU=; b=CNyAhm7EgaF8 358j41mwXjzLj5DGw0r0iEDCnkHGfEB403gGKbm6FDckUCTPYrqNcQcuebAoVfqO27ONnR3jrG0cO 0QvuuF0pUu0cytyb3MtXgXoYvdc3h9X3WBR+Y9VmlyFxBhRJ1+U91IqNYQR7tGlWEhwdXDD7/owdu JOoYAQZZyhgF9ooOCD85+Lrh3/D6+NRlPon+O+TpdK65P9kbdEWuxZJjfYqCl3JXKym6VvKtwJ6bq GPOEhbwsfu7XosnWk2z8WVF4vZhjVC0mgl6QSRbTMLLyDeF1t6OxaJ1yeLKxf03afsQkXYFZP8kwH Bm0MapSaad2yaB9sy2jddQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pNqfG-0001Wa-Da; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 02:39:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Gregory Heytings on Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:20:40 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:254714 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:20:40 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: 56682@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca > > By definition, this cannot be unsafe for any buffer, except those in which > long_line_optimizations_p is set. So the worst that could possibly happen > is that Emacs would hang in some buffers in which > long_line_optimizations_p is set, which is not a regression: Emacs 28 and > earlier would have hanged under the same conditions. Given the fanfare we announced the solution to long-line problems, the above is precisely the definition of "not safe" from my POV. > > Then please do. This is one of a small number of issues whose > > resolution delays the pretest ATM. Which is why I pinged you several > > times over the last month about it. > > I know. Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately?) my time to hack on Emacs > is limited. I'm sorry I have to insist, but does this mean you will be able to fix these documentation issues in less than a week? I don't think I can wait any longer than that. TIA