From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9766: 24.0.50; rmail-forward makes attachment that doesn't read right Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:47:31 +0200 Message-ID: <83vcrnufjg.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318909697 13540 80.91.229.12 (18 Oct 2011 03:48:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 03:48:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9766@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 18 05:48:13 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RG0ez-0004jl-49 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:48:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53329 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RG0ey-0007CJ-NU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:48:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42741) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RG0ev-0007C9-QH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:48:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RG0et-0007y0-Mr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:48:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54301) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RG0et-0007xr-K1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RG0fm-0007Ns-1N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 03:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9766 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9766-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9766.131890971328347 (code B ref 9766); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 03:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9766) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Oct 2011 03:48:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RG0fJ-0007NA-Ce for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:48:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RG0fH-0007Mx-Jb for 9766@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:48:31 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LT800500T2YUJ00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 9766@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:47:31 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.212.197]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LT80054ET76DVC0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:47:31 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:49:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52758 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:42:27 -0400 > From: Richard Stallman > CC: 9766@debbugs.gnu.org > > For the definitive answer, I suggest to start Emacs with the default > value of mail-user-agent, start Rmail, forward (to yourself) a message > with attachments, and then look at hoe message.el did it. > > But that is not conclusive. Why not? Last time I tried it, the result was correctly displayed by Rmail. > What we need is a person who knows MIME > well enough to look at the generated text, and tell us if it has an error. We have Lars and we have Rainer. I wouldn't worry about that.