From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6691: 23.2; Eshell and ^M Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:58:55 +0300 Message-ID: <83vcl21ygg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <13zkahagk7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334394111 3313 80.91.229.3 (14 Apr 2012 09:01:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:01:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6691@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, johnw@newartisans.com To: Leo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 14 11:01:49 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SIyrc-0008RI-TW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:01:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57755 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SIyrc-0004rV-8f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:01:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50710) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SIyrY-0004rC-2D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:01:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SIyrT-0005fM-Ug for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:01:43 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33225) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SIyrT-0005ex-RB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:01:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SIyso-0006QO-1M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6691 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 6691-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6691.133439414924654 (code B ref 6691); Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6691) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Apr 2012 09:02:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57996 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SIysD-0006PY-OA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:02:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:62443) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SIys7-0006PJ-UL for 6691@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:02:24 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M2G00900P0OW300@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 6691@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:00:55 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.57.204]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M2G009B3P1FG1A0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:00:52 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59044 Archived-At: > From: Leo > Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:48:32 +0800 > Cc: 6691@debbugs.gnu.org, John Wiegley , > Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > > BTW, why process coding system for input and output are set to > utf-8-unix? I'm not entirely sure (my failing memory is ... well, failing), but I think that's because guessing the EOL format in process output is unreliable (due to partial reads) and can cause trouble. Again, don't take this for granted; perhaps someone else can confirm or refute.