From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12120: 24.1.50; crash with autocomplete Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 12:59:11 +0300 Message-ID: <83vch0b8k0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r4rpmmqe.fsf@googlemail.com> <83lihxcoda.fsf@gnu.org> <87ehnoiasz.fsf@googlemail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1343987975 14713 80.91.229.3 (3 Aug 2012 09:59:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 09:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12120@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ivan Kanis Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 03 11:59:35 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SxEfP-0003Ww-Ii for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 11:59:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59799 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SxEfO-0000VI-H5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 05:59:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57872) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SxEfL-0000Uc-QW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 05:59:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SxEfH-0007VR-MF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 05:59:31 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48774) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SxEfH-0007VM-Io for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 05:59:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SxEmb-0002sC-VH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 06:07:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 10:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12120 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12120-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12120.134398841711032 (code B ref 12120); Fri, 03 Aug 2012 10:07:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12120) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Aug 2012 10:06:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58320 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SxEmX-0002rt-0G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 06:06:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:65154) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SxEmU-0002rh-Hp for 12120@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 06:06:55 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M8600E00BPVDO00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 12120@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 12:59:17 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M8600D5OBQTXH80@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 12:59:17 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87ehnoiasz.fsf@googlemail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:62787 Archived-At: > From: Ivan Kanis > Cc: 12120@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 11:28:44 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Is this session still running inside GDB, so I can ask you to look > > around and show values of some variables? > > Nope, sorry. Too bad. There's northing I can do about a bug that doesn't have a reproducible recipe, unless you leave it under the debugger and allow to ask questions about values of related variables.