From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13214: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:22:16 +0200 Message-ID: <83vcbzp96f.fsf@gnu.org> References: <21E98F7E271E4C63ABCE0C72CAC780DF@us.oracle.com> <83y5gwownw.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355851365 23625 80.91.229.3 (18 Dec 2012 17:22:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:22:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13214@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 18 18:22:59 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tl0sd-0001lw-0k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:22:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51583 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tl0sP-0002dp-Hk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:22:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55060) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tl0sM-0002cu-OP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:22:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tl0sL-0005k2-Ay for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:22:42 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39147) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tl0sL-0005ju-7p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:22:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tl0td-0005tQ-QB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:24:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13214 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13214-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13214.135585142122626 (code B ref 13214); Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:24:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13214) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Dec 2012 17:23:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49398 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tl0tJ-0005st-3l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:23:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:37076) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tl0tF-0005sk-VE for 13214@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:23:39 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MF800I00LF7QI00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 13214@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:22:03 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MF800IX5LKQMB40@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:22:03 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:68709 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 03:23:29 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Since the revision in which it happened is before Stefan's changes > > that were supposed to solve these assertion violations, this backtrace > > is no longer interesting. > > I'm happy to close it then. Thanks.