From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16244: 24.3.50; eww does not show SVG images in HTML files Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 22:57:36 +0200 Message-ID: <83vbye55mn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8361qe6s7p.fsf@gnu.org> <871u12rod9.fsf@building.gnus.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387918692 16122 80.91.229.3 (24 Dec 2013 20:58:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 20:58:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16244@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 24 21:58:17 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VvZ3Q-0002VE-KX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 21:58:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40393 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvZ3Q-0007GV-AZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:58:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60004) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvZ3H-0007GL-Ur for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:58:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvZ3C-0005V2-74 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:58:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53927) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvZ3C-0005Uy-3F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:58:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvZ3B-0005E2-Q5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:58:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 20:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16244 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16244-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16244.138791866920066 (code B ref 16244); Tue, 24 Dec 2013 20:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16244) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Dec 2013 20:57:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39713 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvZ2v-0005DR-QP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:57:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:61217) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvZ2q-0005DD-G4 for 16244@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:57:44 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MYB00400WSJC400@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 16244@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 22:57:39 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MYB004C7WW30I90@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 22:57:39 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <871u12rod9.fsf@building.gnus.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82549 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 16244@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 21:21:54 +0100 > > Hm. Looking at the source code, this is stuff like: > >

FAIL

 > > Adding support for this would be pretty simple, I think (just treat this > like an tag, more or less) Yes, something like that. I understand this is an embedded object. > but is this a bug fix or a new feature? >"? If it's a bug, I can > whip up a fix... Well, this is a bug report, no?