From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16661: 24.3.50; standalone minibuffer frame gets renamed with name of aother frame Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:23:02 +0200 Message-ID: <83vbwhblkp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <97c44b41-de36-472b-833d-3b0d1ac4c912@default> <831tzgypbp.fsf@gnu.org> <83zjm3xuu8.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392402250 22661 80.91.229.3 (14 Feb 2014 18:24:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16661@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 14 19:24:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WENQu-00021k-4r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:24:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53285 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WENQt-00038M-Oq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:24:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47076) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WENQm-00037X-J6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:24:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WENQg-0004gc-W1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:24:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WENQg-0004gX-Sq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:24:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WENQg-0005pD-3x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:24:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16661 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 16661-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16661.139240219422301 (code B ref 16661); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16661) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2014 18:23:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52609 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WENPt-0005nd-TW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:23:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:60742) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WENPr-0005nG-7T for 16661@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:23:12 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N0Z00J00ZO30I00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 16661@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:25:23 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1000HVZ0IAFN50@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:25:23 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85589 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 07:51:38 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 16661@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Perhaps advising modify-frame-parameters and modify-frame- > > > parameter, to record their changes in some buffer, could > > > find out the answer. > > > > I might do that; dunno. > > I'm afraid that would produce too much noise in *Messages*, as > there are lots of calls to `modify-frame-parameters'. But I'll > think about it. I didn't suggest to put the results in *Messages*. You could use a separate buffer for that.