From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16923: 24.3.50; reression: `set-frame-size' loses mode line Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 17:54:08 +0200 Message-ID: <83vbvvs2fz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <53143D5C.7020000@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393862114 14949 80.91.229.3 (3 Mar 2014 15:55:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 15:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16923@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 03 16:55:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WKVD3-0005J1-Qm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 16:55:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40335 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKVD3-0007gv-1o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 10:55:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50818) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKVCv-0007g7-Sj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 10:55:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKVCp-0006RU-9h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 10:55:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48089) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKVCp-0006Qz-6K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 10:55:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WKVCo-00060Y-C9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 10:55:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16923 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16923-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16923.139386206923015 (code B ref 16923); Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16923) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2014 15:54:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49260 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WKVCG-0005z8-JO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 10:54:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:46287) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WKVCC-0005yt-ML for 16923@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 10:54:26 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1V00900ATF2F00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for 16923@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 17:54:37 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1V00155AV1L570@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 17:54:37 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <53143D5C.7020000@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86498 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 09:29:16 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > Cc: 16923@debbugs.gnu.org > > So I suppose that the regression is already here if in the build from > 2013-12-14 you set `w32-enable-frame-resize-hack' to t. > > If this is the case then we are back at the subject of the Windows-only > bugs 1348 and 16028. Only if you are thinking of reverting that change. I'd rather we tried to fix this regression without re-introducing the old ones.