From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14333: 24.3.50; Emacs hangs when trying to exit Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 17:46:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83vbr080d3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tx6pb6ay.fsf@gnu.org> <83ha2paz0h.fsf@gnu.org> <838uo1auca.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1405349185 21495 80.91.229.3 (14 Jul 2014 14:46:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14333@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 14 16:46:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X6hWE-0008Gq-8r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:46:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58232 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6hWD-0004Kh-R1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:46:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56805) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6hW4-0004Iz-H1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:46:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6hVy-0000iD-HW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:46:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59493) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6hVy-0000hq-FE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X6hVx-0004Ce-Uf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:46:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14333 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 14333-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14333.140534916016148 (code B ref 14333); Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14333) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jul 2014 14:46:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54759 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X6hVv-0004CN-E9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:45:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:41498) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X6hVq-0004C4-PV for 14333@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:45:56 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N8P00D00HW2D400@mtaout26.012.net.il> for 14333@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 17:41:30 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N8P008KOI56ZG50@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 17:41:30 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:91534 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 12:15:11 +0200 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: "14333@debbugs.gnu.org" <14333@debbugs.gnu.org> > > >> > If you comment out the call to term_winsock in term_ntproc, does the > >> > problem go away? > > I've just got a hung session with a binary built with the above change > (on top of the last pre-release 24.3.92.1). > > The backtrace looks similar to the ones already reported: Actually, it's not similar, it's quite different. However, I suspect that GDB lies to us about the backtrace, and at the very least conceals part of the stack frames. Could you please produce the stack traces from Process Explorer, as you did in the past? Thanks.