From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22609: 24.5; Different Font display for windows32 implementation Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 22:54:48 +0200 Message-ID: <83vb5v7ysn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <838u2sbgvq.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455224184 10178 80.91.229.3 (11 Feb 2016 20:56:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 20:56:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22609@debbugs.gnu.org To: Matthew Fidler Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 11 21:56:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aTyHd-0000li-Sz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 21:56:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53502 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTyHa-0008LR-2s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:56:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTyHW-0008Ks-MS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:56:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTyHS-0004Mn-NV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:56:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTyHS-0004Mj-JZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTyHS-0000qU-EN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 20:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22609 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22609-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22609.14552241073178 (code B ref 22609); Thu, 11 Feb 2016 20:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22609) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2016 20:55:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36989 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTyGZ-0000pB-2c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:55:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50617) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aTyGX-0000of-J4 for 22609@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:55:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTyGO-00047j-A1 for 22609@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:55:00 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:32950) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTyGO-00047f-6l; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:54:56 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4959 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aTyGN-0007OO-DV; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:54:56 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Matthew Fidler on Thu, 11 Feb 2016 14:27:12 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:112903 Archived-At: > From: Matthew Fidler > Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 14:27:12 +0000 > Cc: 22609@debbugs.gnu.org > > I thought that I declared what font to use by declaring the 'font property, so it would not be ambiguous to > emacs what font to display the glyph with. There is not 'font' property, AFAIK. Perhaps you meant to define a face that uses the font? That's not what your Lisp does, AFAIU.