From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23595: 25.1.50; file with chinese/japanse chars, vc-diff fails (HG, Git, RCS) Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 05:33:05 +0300 Message-ID: <83vb24423i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bn3z4l9i.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <1444321464004323@web25h.yandex.ru> <83h9do67pp.fsf@gnu.org> <8737p8k8u2.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <838tz065qo.fsf@gnu.org> <87oa7wik8m.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1464057267 3615 80.91.229.3 (24 May 2016 02:34:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 02:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23595@debbugs.gnu.org To: Uwe Brauer Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 24 04:34:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b52Ag-0008OZ-D2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 04:34:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51207 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b52Af-0006hF-HN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:34:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46065) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b52AX-0006fx-8L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:34:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b52AU-0002ZK-36 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51268) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b52AT-0002ZG-Vc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b52AT-0002NB-R4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:34:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 02:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23595 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.14640572009072 (code B ref -1); Tue, 24 May 2016 02:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 May 2016 02:33:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35372 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b529o-0002MF-LT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:33:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54907) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b529m-0002M2-Kv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:33:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b529g-0002Ot-MX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:33:13 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:59615) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b529g-0002OQ-Jq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:33:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45858) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b529e-0006EW-Gs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:33:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b529a-0002NT-93 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:33:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52447) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b529a-0002NH-61; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3802 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b529Y-00043E-Ai; Mon, 23 May 2016 22:33:04 -0400 In-reply-to: <87oa7wik8m.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (message from Uwe Brauer on Mon, 23 May 2016 20:37:29 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:118609 Archived-At: > From: Uwe Brauer > Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 20:37:29 +0000 > > >>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> Right, I see, that was just 2 chars in a document which contained > >> latin-1 or UTF8. So Chinese and Japanese programmers are in a > >> disadvantage, no? > > > Why? UTF-8 supports Chinese just fine. > > Now I am confused. In my poor understanding I thought UTF-16 is needed > for Chinese and Japanese. That seems not to be the case?! No, it's not the case. UTF-8 and UTF-16 both support the same space of Unicode codepoints. > So the problem I reported was caused by the fact that I used UTF-16 > instead of UTF-8? Yes!