From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23574: 24.5; Overzealous underlining in emacs-nox Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 22:18:33 +0300 Message-ID: <83vb1mrura.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83porxwg1f.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1nxudrb.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpm3tyvn.fsf@gnu.org> <83twh7tt83.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3cbt5l3.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9d6tl3j.fsf@gnu.org> <5755AACE.8030303@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1465240769 11909 80.91.229.3 (6 Jun 2016 19:19:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 19:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23574@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, john.b.mastro@gmail.com To: Colin Woodbury Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 06 21:19:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bA03R-0004no-35 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 21:19:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45129 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bA03Q-000859-8N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:19:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45185) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bA03I-00083P-0B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:19:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bA03C-0003Fx-E0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:19:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44726) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bA03C-0003Fr-AW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:19:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bA03C-0007jd-6i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:19:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 19:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23574 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 23574-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23574.146524069829683 (code B ref 23574); Mon, 06 Jun 2016 19:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23574) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2016 19:18:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57063 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bA02U-0007ih-F1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:18:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53081) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bA02S-0007iV-WB for 23574@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:18:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bA02M-0002e8-LJ for 23574@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:18:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bA02H-0002ZC-JC; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:18:05 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4155 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bA02E-0003o9-Co; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:18:04 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Colin Woodbury on Mon, 6 Jun 2016 11:25:34 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:119178 Archived-At: > From: Colin Woodbury > Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 11:25:34 -0700 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Noam Postavsky , 23574@debbugs.gnu.org, > John Mastro > > If your statement that uses an implicit happens to span multiple lines, ensime (I believe) just finds the starting > and ending points of the statement and applies the face to the entire area. In the GUI, this happens to produce > the desired effect of only underlining where characters are (with the newline as well, as mentioned > previously). Once again, there _is_ no newline. It is not displayed. What you see is an empty character cell produced for displaying the cursor. It has no direct relation to the newline. And I don't think what you get is the desired effect, you just get a side effect of a particular implementation detail. E.g., what happens if a line fits exactly on a line, i.e. the cursor at its end will be displayed on the fringe? > In TTY this places the face over everything, which we don't agree is a bug or not. It isn't a bug, because that's how the display engine was coded to work. Of course, we can make it behave differently if we want.