From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24549: 25.1; Customizing group `text' Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 16:40:49 +0300 Message-ID: <83vax3gdr2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <<8aaf30c2-ceb2-4803-9e2e-cd10ad8a3802@default>> <<837f9xct9z.fsf@gnu.org>> <<9eab3611-2ed6-422b-93bc-4270ef1b6082@default>> <<83twd1bcx6.fsf@gnu.org>> <2d7216a4-60c9-40fb-95e4-91894284fbee@default> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475934101 11302 195.159.176.226 (8 Oct 2016 13:41:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 13:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 24549-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 08 15:41:37 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bsrsJ-0008Pn-95 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 15:41:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41181 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsrsH-0002fG-Rp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 09:41:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38901) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsrs8-0002e4-Hy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 09:41:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsrs6-0007pq-Jx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 09:41:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42195) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsrs6-0007pj-Gf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 09:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bsrs6-00011f-Cu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 09:41:02 -0400 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 13:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 24549 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 24549@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com Original-Received: via spool by 24549-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D24549.14759340553922 (code D ref 24549); Sat, 08 Oct 2016 13:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24549-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2016 13:40:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48384 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bsrrz-00011A-If for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 09:40:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47882) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bsrrw-00010v-On for 24549-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 09:40:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsrrn-0007mV-A3 for 24549-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 09:40:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsrrm-0007mF-UV; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 09:40:43 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2720 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bsrrl-0004k6-4B; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 09:40:41 -0400 In-reply-to: <2d7216a4-60c9-40fb-95e4-91894284fbee@default> (message from Drew Adams on Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:58:29 -0700 (PDT)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:124205 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:58:29 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 24549@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > IOW, we can (1) make a group `text' that behaves essentially > > > like `wp' and (2) let users know that `wp' is considered > > > deprecated. > > > > If this works, it is probably better, yes. > > IOW, something like the code below. Thanks, done on the master branch. > Question 1: Why is group `outlines' declared in both > cus-edit.el and outline.el? And in outline.el it has a > prefix declared, but not in cus-edit.el. Group `outlines' > is not _used_ in cus-edit.el, AFAICT. What would happen > if we removed group `outlines' from cus-edit.el? > (This question has nothing to do with this bug report. > Just happened to notice the duplication.) This duplication is an oversight from when outline.el was converted to use Custom. I fixed this now. > Question 2: Should group `text' inherit directly from group > `emacs'? Should it also inherit from group `wp'? I left it inherit from both. It cannot do any harm, I think. > I think the answer to both of these is yes. WDYT? > > Question 3: Should group `wp' still be inherited from, by a > group that now inherits from `text'? E.g., should group > `tildify' inherit from both `wp' as well as from `text'? > > I don't think so. If group `text' itself inherits from `wp' > then I don't think there is any reason that we need to have > other groups still inherit directly from `wp' (as well as > from `text'). WDYT? I agree. I think this bug is now done.