From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25071: 26.0.50; Various Forth related improvements for etags Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:47:45 +0200 Message-ID: <83vav4q2pq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83inr5q9i4.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480528097 11075 195.159.176.226 (30 Nov 2016 17:48:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:48:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25071@debbugs.gnu.org To: Helmut Eller Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 30 18:48:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cC8zL-0001uT-TI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:48:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45473 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC8zP-000895-R4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:48:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55227) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC8zF-00087E-NF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:48:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC8zC-0005Y5-DY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:48:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60560) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC8zC-0005Xq-AU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cC8zC-0004G5-4B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:48:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25071 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 25071-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25071.148052807116349 (code B ref 25071); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25071) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2016 17:47:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47726 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cC8z0-0004Fc-Mm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:47:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35858) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cC8yy-0004FQ-J0 for 25071@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:47:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC8yq-0005Rs-8K for 25071@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:47:43 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:58744) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC8yq-0005Ro-54; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:47:40 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2371 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cC8yp-0001D8-I3; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:47:39 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Helmut Eller on Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:55:02 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126321 Archived-At: > From: Helmut Eller > Cc: 25071@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:55:02 +0100 > > On Wed, Nov 30 2016, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> With the patch, etags creates explicit tag names. That works better in > >> combination with tag-exact-match-p. > > > > Can you explain more about this? Explicit tag names bloat the TAGS > > files, so other languages don't use that by default, except where > > really needed. > > Yes, the TAGS file becomes at most twice as big. That's a minor > disadvantage that I'm happy to trade for even tiny improvements in > precision. It clearly isn't a catastrophe, if doing that is necessary. I just want to be sure that all Forth tags need to be explicit. Is there perhaps some reasonably easy way to make only those tags explicit which actually use the special characters that require it? > > Also, it sounds like you send a patch wrt emacs-25 branch; if so, > > please rebase on master, since that is where the patch will be pushed > > eventually. The test files are in a different place on master. > > The patch is against master, but I wrote the wrong filenames in the > changelog, because I copied part of it from an old commit message. OK, thanks.