From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25890: Default value of digits-per-component? Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 05:36:53 +0300 Message-ID: <83vaqr5w3e.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6acea5ef-1c46-fefd-8cf6-290a0308185b@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490841499 28394 195.159.176.226 (30 Mar 2017 02:38:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 02:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25890@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 30 04:38:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPyS-00068U-47 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 04:38:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33397 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPyY-0005iz-5C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:38:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPyR-0005ig-Bo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPyM-0002wd-CS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53591) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPyM-0002wU-8h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPyM-0008KH-3U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 02:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25890 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25890-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25890.149084142631944 (code B ref 25890); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 02:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25890) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2017 02:37:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51790 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPxS-0008JA-H9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:37:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40061) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPxR-0008Ih-2f for 25890@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:37:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPxH-0002Ag-10 for 25890@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:37:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51524) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPxG-0002Ac-Tt; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:36:54 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4106 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ctPxG-0005Dk-8C; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:36:54 -0400 In-reply-to: <6acea5ef-1c46-fefd-8cf6-290a0308185b@gmail.com> (message from =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel on Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:01:09 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:131079 Archived-At: > Cc: Eli Zaretskii > From: Clément Pit-Claudel > Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:01:09 -0400 > > > If the change I made is nevertheless deemed too drastic, then what are > > our alternatives? The only one I could think of is to define a new > > function and deprecate color-name-to-rgb in favor of that new > > function, which will then display warnings when code using it is > > compiled, and eventually cause them to make changes in their code > > anyway. Is that better? Or are there any better ideas? > > It sounds much better to me: the current solution breaks all code silently I'm not sure I understand how come all users of that function are suddenly broken. A different result doesn't yet mean breakage, unless the caller actually expected the precise format the old version was producing, and relied on that. Is that indeed so in the callers you saw?