From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34589: 26.1.91; GDB-MI Display Complex Data Types Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:40:53 +0200 Message-ID: <83va1aq1ui.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wolugz2r.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="22531"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34589@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gustaf Waldemarson Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 23 10:41:15 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gxTo1-0005h1-W4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:41:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35412 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxTo0-0007uU-Qb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 04:41:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35905) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxTnv-0007uO-7f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 04:41:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxTnt-0001Mn-57 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 04:41:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35347) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxTnq-0001LM-7W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 04:41:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gxTnq-000629-44 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 04:41:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 09:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34589 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34589-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34589.155091485723176 (code B ref 34589); Sat, 23 Feb 2019 09:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34589) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2019 09:40:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48891 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gxTnk-00061i-UD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 04:40:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49708) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gxTnj-00061U-08 for 34589@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 04:40:55 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47970) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gxTnc-0001EK-Vz; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 04:40:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2383 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gxTnc-0006mt-HA; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 04:40:48 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Gustaf Waldemarson on Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:42:54 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155681 Archived-At: > From: Gustaf Waldemarson > Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:42:54 +0100 > Cc: 34589@debbugs.gnu.org > > I've attached the patches that accomplishes the above, but you may > want to have someone review it that actually knows at bit more about > gdb-mi.el. Thanks, I will review this soon. But in any case, this is too large for us to accept without you assigning the copyright. Would you like to start the legal paperwork rolling, so that it's done by the time we are ready to install the changes? If yes, I will send you the form off-list.