From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34589: 26.1.91; GDB-MI Display Complex Data Types Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 11:06:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83va0tag67.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wolugz2r.fsf@gnu.org> <83va1aq1ui.fsf@gnu.org> <83o972pz92.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhqbe2og.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="45808"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, 34589@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org To: Gustaf Waldemarson Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 08 10:08:16 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h2BUF-000Bo8-D5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 10:08:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39440 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2BUE-0003ex-Ef for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 04:08:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34282) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2BU8-0003ep-Am for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 04:08:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2BU2-0006G6-TB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 04:08:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50515) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2BU2-0006FH-KL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 04:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2BU2-0004jW-6O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 04:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 09:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34589 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34589-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34589.155203604318145 (code B ref 34589); Fri, 08 Mar 2019 09:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34589) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2019 09:07:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35826 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2BTP-0004ib-Dx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 04:07:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47989) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h2BTN-0004iH-Eu for 34589@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 04:07:21 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51143) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2BT9-0004c3-Ib; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 04:07:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4499 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h2BT0-0001xd-LM; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 04:06:59 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Gustaf Waldemarson on Mon, 4 Mar 2019 09:05:26 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:156137 Archived-At: > From: Gustaf Waldemarson > Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 09:05:26 +0100 > Cc: 34589@debbugs.gnu.org, "Andrew W. Nosenko" , > Robert Pluim , rms@gnu.org > > >Yes. I asked about the first patch because it's small enough to be > > accepted even without legal paperwork. The second one exceeds the > > limits of that. > > Ah, got it. Feel free to review and include it if you find it useful. Thanks. Unfortunately, it turns out that the first patch makes little sense without the second, as most of the code modified by the former is introduced in the latter. So I didn't apply any of your changes for now; hopefully, you will be able to overcome the legal obstacles at some point.