From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35434: terminal emacs: continuation line indicator missing when word wrapping is enabled Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:10:04 +0300 Message-ID: <83v9z1vug3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831s1pxbsj.fsf@gnu.org> <83wojhvw4g.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="127256"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 35434@debbugs.gnu.org To: Luis Gerhorst Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 26 14:12:55 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hJzin-000Wy8-Sh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:12:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46245 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJzim-0000Nb-Po for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:12:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39236) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJzh0-00079d-WC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJzh0-0004kZ-4u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46735) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJzh0-0004kP-1u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hJzgz-0002Dz-S5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:11:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35434 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35434-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35434.15562806388521 (code B ref 35434); Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35434) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Apr 2019 12:10:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60279 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hJzgc-0002DN-5Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:10:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52931) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hJzga-0002DB-Ti for 35434@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:10:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51103) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hJzgN-0004I0-V7; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:10:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1407 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hJzgL-00020X-SI; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:10:23 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Luis Gerhorst on Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:49:08 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:158292 Archived-At: > From: Luis Gerhorst > Cc: 35434@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:49:08 +0200 > > > Would you perhaps like to describe the idea behind the patch you > > would like to submit before actually coding it? This could avoid > > the need to rework it more than necessary. > > Code-wise I have no idea yet ;) > > My initial approach would be to have a look at the patches that > introduced word wrapping in the first place. If I'm lucky they > modified the GUI code to still show the fringe indicators, but > simply missed the TUI code. > > However, I've not read any Emacs C code ever. I'll look into it and > come back when I unserstand the problem. Look at the function produce_special_glyphs in xdisp.c. I think showing the continuation glyphs on TTY frames in word-wrap mode should be optional, controlled by a user variable, since the current behavior is unchanged since Emacs 23. Thanks.